|
Post by Webster on Jun 10, 2015 1:29:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 13, 2015 0:31:56 GMT -5
a few guesses why there's no supersonic passenger planes are;
-reserved for government/military and not the public... -too risky... -the public might not be for it...
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jun 13, 2015 0:49:24 GMT -5
a few guesses why there's no supersonic passenger planes are; -reserved for government/military and not the public... -too risky... -the public might not be for it... Don't know about guesses 1 & 3 but guess #2 is good...
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 13, 2015 1:18:27 GMT -5
Webster, would you fly in a plane going that fast?
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jun 13, 2015 1:33:52 GMT -5
Webster, would you fly in a plane going that fast? Let me think....yes.
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 13, 2015 3:28:38 GMT -5
Webster, would you fly in a plane going that fast? Let me think....yes. would be crazy... would be crazy expensive for airliners as well, maybe that's another reason why it's not logical at the present time...
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jun 13, 2015 23:57:03 GMT -5
Let me think....yes. would be crazy... would be crazy expensive for airliners as well, maybe that's another reason why it's not logical at the present time... In the end, it eventually was too expensive...plus, most other long-distance aircraft had become more efficient to run than the Concorde.
|
|