|
Post by +Justice on Jun 15, 2015 5:32:24 GMT -5
are you?
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jun 15, 2015 17:07:24 GMT -5
My answer....
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 16, 2015 1:49:19 GMT -5
My answer.... i wish it was that simple, but proof is in the pudding with a sprinkle of common sense and logical thinking at best... a lot of cover-ups and lies have been busted open with truth, evidence and in time... but at the same time things stay under the rug for life due to lack of proof and key people that get smoked to silence and keep the secret out of the lime-light...
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jun 16, 2015 2:05:54 GMT -5
My answer.... i wish it was that simple, but proof is in the pudding with a sprinkle of common sense and logical thinking at best... a lot of cover-ups and lies have been busted open with truth, evidence and in time... but at the same time things stay under the rug for life due to lack of proof and key people that get smoked to silence and keep the secret out of the lime-light... Problem with conspiracies, Justice, is that, over time, conspiracies fall apart, either through leaks - from the inside or the outside - or through underestimating the common sense of the people or through the sometimes sheer ridiculousness of them. Case in point: one of the linchpins of the 9/11 Truther theories is that, at the temperature that jet fuel burns at, there's no way that it could've melted steel, thus there's no way the buildings could've come down as they did. Problem there is that the steel never melted...bear with me here. Steel used for construction is a very versatile, strong substance...but when you have steel in a vertical position with weight atop it, any weakening of the steel at any point in that vertical column will bring whatever is using that steel in a load-bearing capacity down upon itself...which is pretty much what happened. Because of the intense heat generated by the planes crashing into the Twin Towers and the resulting fires that developed, the steel that was being used in the Towers was weakened by the fires...and once weakened, gravity brought the whole damned thing down.
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 16, 2015 2:41:31 GMT -5
i wish it was that simple, but proof is in the pudding with a sprinkle of common sense and logical thinking at best... a lot of cover-ups and lies have been busted open with truth, evidence and in time... but at the same time things stay under the rug for life due to lack of proof and key people that get smoked to silence and keep the secret out of the lime-light... Problem with conspiracies, Justice, is that, over time, conspiracies fall apart, either through leaks - from the inside or the outside - or through underestimating the common sense of the people or through the sometimes sheer ridiculousness of them. Case in point: one of the linchpins of the 9/11 Truther theories is that, at the temperature that jet fuel burns at, there's no way that it could've melted steel, thus there's no way the buildings could've come down as they did. Problem there is that the steel never melted...bear with me here. Steel used for construction is a very versatile, strong substance...but when you have steel in a vertical position with weight atop it, any weakening of the steel at any point in that vertical column will bring whatever is using that steel in a load-bearing capacity down upon itself...which is pretty much what happened. Because of the intense heat generated by the planes crashing into the Twin Towers and the resulting fires that developed, the steel that was being used in the Towers was weakened by the fires...and once weakened, gravity brought the whole damned thing down. there's plenty of problems with what you just said... for one, when both were down, you can clearly see bottom steal beams of the building sparking and melting, jet fuel never was that low and it's in your own science that jet fuel can't make steal melt like that as well as jet fuel would have instantly burned itself out... also jet fuel can't cut steal beams diagonally like we see in the twin towers... also, why did the government make it a point to destroy the evidence and the crime scene almost instantly like they didn't want anyone to investigate? why was a team of specialist in the area and ready to clean it up like it was planned out? see Webster, there's so much that was involved that it's mind blowing, and people just accept the pathetic official report of it like it's nothing even when most of it, if not all of it doesn't make any sense and goes against your science, logic and common sense...
|
|
|
Post by +Justice on Jun 17, 2015 6:04:59 GMT -5
also:
|
|